Our editor-in-chief Nate Yapp is proud to have contributed to the new book Hidden Horror: A Celebration of 101 Underrated and Overlooked Fright Flicks, edited by Aaron Christensen. Another contributors include Anthony Timpone, B.J. Colangelo, Dave Alexander, Classic-Horror.com's own Robert C. Ring and John W. Bowen. Pick up a copy today from Amazon.com!

Look Back in Angus: Confessions of a "Phantasm" Phanboy

Author
Date
04-01-2001
Comments
Look Back in Angus
Keywords

The funeral is about to begin... Sir!

In movies, it’s often much too easy to see the pivotal moment coming; in real life, we rarely do. In fact, we’re usually blindsided by it, and I must admit I prefer it that way. Case in point...

Summer, 1980, Kingston, Ontario, Canada: a bunch of very wasted teenagers sardine themselves into somebody’s parents’ puke-green hatchback (a Mercury Bobcat, if you must know) and head out to the drive-in. Their mission is twofold: (a) see Halloween, that new horror film everyone’s talking about and (b) get even more wasted. Two hours later, the verdict is unanimous: Halloween rules. So does John Carpenter. So does Jamie Lee Curtis, even though she keeps her top on throughout the entire film. The delinquents in question have never heard of the second film on the evening’s bill, but given their current condition, no one is in a big hurry to go home.

Without fanfare - hell, without any opening credits, even - a stark, red logo now appears over black on the drive-in screen, framed idiomatically by the night sky: PHANTASM. Ten minutes in, the delinquents are mesmerised by this atmospheric and unpredictable gem they’ve stumbled across; after thirty minutes, they’re reassuring each other that the whole thing isn’t just a hallucination. Jaws drop as they watch a young boy being chased around a mausoleum by killer dwarves and airborne metallic brain-drillers... and what’s the story on this huge, sinister undertaker guy? By the time it’s all over, one delinquent - a gangly, pallid longhair in an AC/DC shirt - is convinced that he’s just seen the best horror film ever. Even then, of course, he has no idea that by the time he hits his late thirties, he’ll have seen Phantasm over fifty times. For better or worse on this night, a Phanboy is born.

Although writer/director Don Coscarelli already had two independent films (Kenny and Company and Jim The World’s Greatest) under his belt prior to starting work on Phantasm in the late seventies, he was barely into his twenties. His first horror film would be a modest low-budget effort (around $300,000) destined for the then-lucrative drive-in and grindhouse circuit. It would chronicle the misadventures of two recently orphaned brothers (Michael Baldwin and Bill Thornbury) and their ice cream vendor friend (Reggie Bannister) who investigate some mysterious goings-on at a mortuary in their small Oregon town; the film would be an inventive and infectious marriage of gothic horror, sci-fi, old-style boy’s adventure stories, absurdism and the buddy film. It would also introduce horror icon-in-waiting Angus Scrimm as the Tall Man, a time-travelling, dimension-jumping grave robber who re-animates corpses for use as slave labour.

Down the years, horror has enjoyed an on-off romance with surrealism, from The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari to Carnival of Souls to The Exorcist to A Nightmare On Elm Street and beyond. The late seventies, however, saw surrealism in horror at a low ebb; this was the era of Halloween, The Hills Have Eyes and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, all of which featured their share of bizarre images and situations and often flirted with absurdity as a purely atmospheric device (particularly evident in Texas Chain Saw) but stuck resolutely to logical narrative. Phantasm flew in the face of contemporary trends in the genre, gleefully tossing us headlong into the dreams and hallucinations (or were they...?) of its characters, causing us to constantly second-guess our own perceptions. It would also prove that graphic violence and subtle atmospherics could not only coexist in a film but actually compliment each other. Coscarelli, of course, wasn’t content to stop there; he also served us up a parable about family, friendship, loyalty and - in the sequels - the ugly reality of betrayal. Two decades and three sequels later, Phantasm commands a huge and fanatical following worldwide - spawning dozens of websites and, last year, a fan convention - an outcome Coscarelli swears up and down he never anticipated.

...and you’re a bald, middle-aged ex-ice cream vendor.

Nearly a decade would pass before the release of Phantasm II, again written and directed by Coscarelli and featuring Scrimm and Bannister reprising their roles while James LeGros replaced Michael Baldwin in the role of Mike. (Trivia: LeGros was chosen over a young and unknown Brad Pitt.) The sequel begins with Mike being released from a mental hospital seven years after we last saw him, unable to make even Reggie - whose memory seems to have been wiped - believe his story. Reggie gets his comeuppance almost immediately when his wife and daughters are killed by the Tall Man; thoroughly convinced now, he agrees to help Mike search for the Tall Man and his minions. Mike is also looking for Liz (Paula Irvine), a girl to whom he is psychically linked who has also run afoul of the Tall Man. Reggie - largely relegated to zany sidekick status in the first film - really blossoms into a legitimate leading character here (somewhere between a father figure and an adopted older brother), with the likable Bannister proving his talents more than equal to the task. In some (if not all) respects, this one stands out as the best in the series; while still relatively low-budget, Phantasm II had studio backing and the production values are significantly higher. The first film’s trademarks are all present and accounted for: Scrimm returns as the Tall Man, replete with his army of dwarves and new and improved flying metal spheres, and Coscarelli’s penchants for mortuaries, muscle cars and wonderfully improbable homemade weaponry are abundant as well. While retaining the characterization and atmospherics of the original, the sequel benefits from quicker pacing and near-relentless action from start to finish, and while no box office records were broken, Phantasm II met with immediate and unanimous approval from Phans old and new.

Picture that - the three of us facing down the forces of evil.

Released straight to video in 1994, Phantasm III: Lord of the Dead featured Michael Baldwin returning as Mike, who is about to discover that he’s much more than a victim of the Tall Man; he’ll learn now that he’s actually an integral part of the villain’s plan. This one picks up at the very instant Phantasm II ends, with the supposedly vanquished Tall Man suddenly reappearing to murder Liz and nearly kill Mike and Reggie in a car wreck. The cat-and-mouse game continues as our protagonists receive some unexpected help from the ghost of Mike’s long-dead older brother Jody, again protrayed by Bill Thornbury. Mortals joining the fight this time are a young boy (the engaging Kevin Connors) who has lost his parents to the Tall Man, and a tough, resourceful ex-soldier (Gloria Lynne Henry). While Lord of the Dead isn’t without some fine ingredients - most notably the same manic energy that propelled Phantasm II as well as some very slick effects and the trademark elaborate set pieces - Coscarelli’s over-reliance on cheap jokes nearly derails it. Humour was certainly abundant in (and integral to) the first two films, but the absurdity of various situations was allowed to speak for itself without being punctuated with an endless supply of one-liners. While it would be both unfair and inaccurate to accuse Lord of the Dead of favouring style over substance, there’s no getting around the fact that when the series is three films deep, we deserve more answers (or at least more development) than this one provides. Still, Coscarelli deserves props for resisting the temptation to simply rewrite the rules for the sake of convenience.

Things took a strange turn behind the scenes a year or so after Lord of the Dead was released: Phans fairly salivated when rumours began circulating that screenwriter Roger Avary, fresh off an Oscar win for co-writing Pulp Fiction, was collaborating on a new Phantasm script with Coscarelli. This was an unprecedented development, considering that Coscarelli had always maintained tight creative control over the series, especially after his disastrous experience with meddlesome studio execs on his 1982 feature Beastmaster. Word went around that the Avary/Coscarelli collaboration would be an epic final chapter in which the Tall Man has taken over most of North America - Phantasm meets The Stand, with a dash of Escape From New York. Coscarelli maintained he could bring the whole thing off for a budget of less than $10 million; it’s a pretty paltry sum by current standards and yet most industry insiders agreed that Coscarelli’s claim was credible, given his track record for delivering films that belied their meager funding, always on time and under budget. This above all seemed to guarantee that Phantasm 2012 (working title) would go into production in very short order - well, that’s how it seemed, anyway.

Each week, it seemed, a new rumour would circulate about who was financing the new Phantasm and when it would go into production; right on cue, word would arrive a short time later that the deal had fallen through, but now someone else was interested... ad nauseum. Whether as a stopgap to sustain audience interest or out of sheer frustration, Coscarelli eventually went to his backup plan: a completely different, self-penned script that could be produced for peanuts (reputedly under $700,000, the lowest budget since the original). This new script was also said to be constructed to dovetail chronologically with the Avary script, as Coscarelli remained optimistic that the epic would eventually be made. The cameras rolled and, late in 1998, Phantasm: OblIVion was unleashed.

Seeing is easy. Understanding? That takes a little more time.

While the third installment had met with some criticism over its flippant tone, OblIVion would prove genuinely controversial, dividing Phans sharply over its relative merits. Diffuse and non-linear, it’s simultaneously the most ambitious film in the series to date and the most low-key; the sublimely nightmarish opening sequence alone easily ranks among the best work Coscarelli’s ever done, and yet this film utilizes fewer big effects than the others. Once again, the action kicks off at the precise moment that the previous film concludes - damn, these are fun to watch back to back! Mike swipes a hearse and flees into the California desert, convinced that he’s doomed but determined to fight to the bitter end and find some answers in the process; after some prodding from a disembodied Jody, Reggie reluctantly gives chase in his cherished Hemicuda. Stripped down and almost unrelentingly dark, OblIVion’s time-jumping narrative makes it the first film in the series that’s absolutely guaranteed to baffle those who haven’t seen the first three. Long-faithful Phans, however, are in for some real treats, not least of which is the revelation of the Tall Man’s true identity... well, not quite, but at least we finally discover who he once was, even if the exact circumstances surrounding his transformation remain largely unknown. Baldwin is particularly memorable in this installment, establishing Mike as a classic tragic hero, physically and emotionally battered but determined to go down swinging. Far and away the most impressive aspect of OblIVion is the way Coscarelli seamlessly incorporates a number of unused scenes from the original Phantasm as flashbacks - it’s astounding to see Baldwin at the ages of twelve and thirty-two in the same film. (Bannister and Scrimm, on the other hand, hardly seem to have aged at all.) This device is especially effective during the final sequence, in which the film doesn’t so much end as dissolve, a significant departure from its cliffhanger predecessors.

Let me release you from this imperfect flesh...

Even if the much-anticipated final chapter is never made, Phantasm remains the only horror franchise that’s genuinely worth following. The lofty mantle of auteur has been recklessly bestowed on a lot of marginally worthy horror directors, but Don Coscarelli remains one of the few who can wear it legitimately. How many other series in our beloved genre have been entirely written, directed and produced by the same person, as well as retaining the same core group of lead actors? This is a family affair in the classic sense; even the closing credits reveal a lot of familiar names among the crew.

Relentless sequelization has rendered Michael Myers and Jason Voorhees even more one-dimensional and robotic than they were in their respective debuts while Freddy Krueger has been homogenised into an utterly unfrightening cartoon - death by marketing. The Tall Man, however, still inspires genuine dread; two decades have not diminished the sinister charisma of Angus Scrimm. Inducted into Fangoria’s Hall of Fame several years back, Scrimm remains the face of Phantasm, standing at the forefront of numerous visual and thematic trademarks associated with the series. It’s an odd success story - in four films over twenty years, he’s slowly made the transition from cult favourite to bona fide horror icon. In an age of crass, wisecracking horror movie villains-turned-hucksters, the Tall Man retains a curious dignity, a spiritual descendant of the classic monsters of Universal’s heyday. Scrimm’s genial offscreen persona has helped make him a popular attraction at horror conventions and film fests worldwide, but there’s no disputing that it’s the Tall Man who keeps Phans turning out in droves year after year.

The great paradox of the series is that while the relationship between Mike and the Tall Man is the backbone of the story, the exact nature of that relationship has never been made entirely clear. (This is probably the single hottest topic of speculation on countless Phantasm message boards.) When first meet our adolescent hero, he’s still reeling from the deaths of his parents and in a panic over the impending departure of his older brother; it’s no secret that the kid has some well-founded abandonment issues. While the Tall Man is first and foremost a personification of death, Mike also seems to view him as the embodiment of all the destruction and uncertainty that has thrown his life into chaos; he’s not unlike the Death card in a Tarot deck, a harbinger of sudden and often calamitous change.

It’s never over!

Will a fifth Phantasm ever see daylight? Insiders remain relatively optimistic, although the project has been shelved for the time being as Coscarelli begins work on a new film, rumoured to be an adaption of Joe Lansdale’s story "Bubba-Ho Tep." Meanwhile, Phans are rejoicing over news that Bruce Campbell of Evil Dead fame has been confirmed to star opposite Scrimm and Bannister should the next chapter be greenlit.

Twenty-plus years and multiple viewings later, I’m well aware of Phantasm’s many flaws. In fact, I’m hard-pressed to name another film (or series of films) that’s so flawed and yet works so well. Serious lapses in logic? Sure. Continuity problems? Hell, yeah. Regardless, Phantasm’s hold on me remains as strong as ever, my deep affection for it absolutely undiminished. Several decades back, a simple trip to the drive-in exploded into a lifelong obsession; as Reggie says, "I enlisted for the duration."

Its the only films that i

Its the only films that i watch all the time back to back. I hope that sometime down the road that another phantasm movie made or to continue the series because what movies that are being made are the that great once you see them at the movies leaves me disappionted when i go to see them. I just a great fan of the phantasm movies, they ever get old. I love watching them. Oh I hated when liz was kill in phantasm III, thats the only thing I didn't like about that movie, you need a female hero to help battle against the tall man. So keep up the go work and hope to see a few more phantasm movies soon.

Scot

 

Yes it would be lovely to see

Yes it would be lovely to see the franchise continue! Phantasm is one of my top favorite horror movies of all time, not to mention the series! I hope someone can get together & produce a movie that explains the Tall Man's origin, how Mike is connected & all. Phantasm is truly one of the greatest horror series ever made! The flying spheres are just classic because they are unique unto themselves! I've never seen anything like it then or since! With today's technology, the sphere's depth of "kills" can be greater than ever! The scene in the second one was classic with the sphere going in that guys back & traveling up through to his mouth! Now who can guess what could be done to someone by these spheres! Shape shifting, various weapons, their size, who knows, the skies the limit! I hope another one or two films can be pulled off sometime soon! The Tall Man forever remains one of horror films favorite characters as well as mine!

Ah memories! I think I was

Ah memories! I think I was about ten years old when I first saw Phantasm and it tramatized the hell out of me, especially that scene with the fly in the garbage disposal and the flying blood-sucking spiked ball. Pretty mundane stuff by today's standards for sure, but back then it was pretty damned scary.

You comment about the tarot Death card sparked my curiosity. Its tarot card meaning is not as nearly as sinister as I supposed.

Thanks.

 

 


 

Thank you for a thoroughly

Thank you for a thoroughly entertaining piece on the Phantasm series!

I remember the first time I saw Phantasm was on video in 1979 or 1980, with my best friend Rick (RIP mate). His family had a Beta video recorder and we hired horror movies most weekends. "The Never Dead" was the title of the video, one of the first released in Australia. Rick didn't 'get' the odd mixture of horror, drama, humour and sci-fi from this movie with flying spheres, a kid, a guitar-playing ice-cream seller, and The Tall Man. I was entranced and it became the yardstick by which I measured all other horror movies. I knew other movies had better effects and bigger budgets, but few came close.

I looked for years (in pre-internet days) to find the video, succeeding some 15 years later to find the sequel! One watch and I was hooked: I thought it was even better than Re-Animator! Eventually I tracked down a copy of "The Never Dead" video (this time on VHS) and watched it over and over. It wasn't until last year that I read of the entire Phantasm series being released on DVD and I heard of III and OblIVion.

I agree with you on all points and hope for one thing with regards to this superlative (true) horror franchise... that 5 is produced and it removes the taste of ObliVions cheat-ending from me.

 

Nonetheless, I applaud Don Coscarelli for his remarkable concept and hope "I Sell The Dead" proves to be a springboard for the next installment.

 

Yes, I will definitely agree

Yes, I will definitely agree that Phantasm is one of the most "ass-kicking" horror movies I have ever watched.
Krueger Freddy, ok, but ended up as a "let's make another one, and make money from it", though it is still cool movie.
Phantasm on the other hand, is mysterious. The depth of this strange, eerie mysticism that is eminent in the movie, is a hook for me. The first one, is a classic. "Boy!!!". Althought the ending is somewhat strange(retcon, Jody's end, dream scenes with those strange dwarf-like creatures, and hands grapping Mike from the mirror), I still value it for it's climate and "feel". I did not watched yet another movie that good (OK - "Tetsuo" - this Japanese horror about a guy that is transformed into metal-man -  is even better, but that another category of movie for me, more surreal). 10/10
The second Phantasm is a good movie. I like to compare it to some Hunter the Reckoning and Hunter the Vigil Role Playing Games. Or any other Role Playing Games where the party assumes the roles of normal humans facing some insurmountable Evil One. Action packed, cool backstory (chasing the Tall Man, discovering the emptied towns), strange Mike actor(hmm, he has a strange face) and well, the pace. No smartass-talk, pure action. 8+/10
Third one is somewhat boring. Strange kid, simpleton black-woman character with an attitude (my friend is dead but I do not give a fuck - this scene with the Dead Balls in the mortuary) and lots of "ghost chasing". Worth a while, especially as a continuation of the second movie, but if you watch it off the track, well it does not offer much - boring. 6/10
Fourth one is the most metaphisical one. Worth mainly for the schizo-scenes "somewhere in the nowhere" (I dare you to name it better!), and of course as a continuation of the main line. The future of Phantasm world is barren and desolate, the Tall Man has won and conquered this world (time-travel alterations in the future movies?). The movie is ok, but definitively heavy in climate. It's is ok when you watch it as a continuation of the previous ones, but almost incomprehensible when you watch it out of order (or at least very confusing). 6/10

The whole series is a very decent piece of horror movies. If you are a horror movie fan you should give it a go. If you only like to watch some decent horrors from time to time, just watch the masterpiece Part 1 and saviour the impressions. If you like some action packed, hunter-themed horror, Part 2 is also a bodacious film to watch (the jury-rigged weapons - the double boomstick, this insane spray-flamethrowrer) mostly thanks to the pace and the overall feel. You could end on the second part without loosing much, if you are not a Phanboy. Diehards will of course swallow everything.

Overall, the series is a 7+/10 for me, loosing this 2+ for the rag-tagness of the third part (old boy + gunslinger kiddo + simpleton woman = DUH?) and boooring factor of the fourth one, without giving concrete facts about the plot.

Awaiting the next one.

"BOY!!!"

launch business of of

launch business of of [url=https://www.facebook.com/pages/iPod-Touch-5-case/685159778199615?sk=app_208195102528120]ipod cases[/url] factors. consumer cost for [url=https://www.facebook.com/pages/iPhone-5-iPhone-5S-Case/1471341836446770?sk=app_208195102528120]cheap iphone 5 cases[/url] in relatively (Hermes) as [url=https://www.facebook.com/pages/iphone-5c-cases/676902282394808?sk=app_208195102528120]cases for 5c[/url] international 14 characteristics, Association [url=https://www.facebook.com/pages/Note-2-cases/510850779061821?sk=app_208195102528120]samsung galaxy note 2 cases[/url]

luxury Chandon number to

luxury Chandon number to [url=http://www.edicions1984.cat/Banderas/thh.html]louis vuitton chaussure[/url] should its a Rolls-Royce [url=http://www.edicions1984.cat/Banderas/thh.html]sacs louis vuitton pas cher[/url] the not 5 2012 [url=http://www.edicions1984.cat/Banderas/thh.html]sac a mains louis vuitton[/url] exotic research, of conscious, [url=http://www.edicions1984.cat/favicon/pdfs/ko.cfm]chaussur louis vuitton[/url]

Post new comment

All comments should adhere to Classic-Horror.com's Comment Policy
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <sup> <blockquote> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <br> <p>
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Search