Our editor-in-chief Nate Yapp is proud to have contributed to the new book Hidden Horror: A Celebration of 101 Underrated and Overlooked Fright Flicks, edited by Aaron Christensen. Another contributors include Anthony Timpone, B.J. Colangelo, Dave Alexander, Classic-Horror.com's own Robert C. Ring and John W. Bowen.  Pick up a copy today from Amazon.com!
Candyman (1992)
As Freddy promised he was indeed dead and Jason swore he had retired                to hell, the slasher genre found itself in need of a few new slashers.                Before the search was rendered moot by Jason and Freddy's return                from the grave (the lying bastards), horror fans were forced to                suffer through such wannabes as Dr.                Giggles and Leprechaun,                with only 1992's Candyman appearing as a worthy heir to the                throne that Scream would eventually                claim.
 
 Based on a short story by Clive Barker and transplanted from the                slums of Britain to the projects of Chicago, the literate and utterly                creepy Candyman examines the power of myth and the role of imagination                in fear. The titular legend involves the son of a slave who was                tortured and murdered for impregnating a white woman.
 
 For revenge the townspeople cut off Candyman's hand, inserted a                hook into the stump (why I'm not sure, but if makes for a grisly                weapon) and covered him with honey before leaving him to the bees.                He has haunted the bedtime stories and nightmares of his Chicago                burial ground every since, shedding innocent blood when his name                is spoken five times into a mirror. 
 
 In my town the legend involved Bloody Mary, who would appear in                your mirror if you turned out the lights and spoke her name three                times to your own reflection. Which is why the film works so well:                The legend of Candyman is a version of a campfire ghost tale most                kids have probably encountered in some form of another. What Barker                and Paperhouse director Bernard Rose ask us is "What                if, through enough believers in his existence, a mythical figure                could transform from chilling apparition to flesh and blood terror?"
The story revolves around Helen Lyle (Virginia Madsen), a University                of Illinois graduate student doing her thesis on urban legends.                As much to prove her professor husband (the always sleazy Xander                Berkeley) and his academic cronies wrong, Lyle sets out to Candyman's                alleged home, the notorious Chicago housing project Cabrini Green,                to explore the legend of the hooked killer. When Lyle casts doubts                upon the existence of the supernatural figure, Candyman feels obliged                to re-capture the faith of his "congregation."
 
 From the films opening sequence (a flowing tracking shot high above                the Chicago interstate, backed by the first notes of composer Philip                Glass' classic score), Candyman drips with atmosphere. Though Rose                does occasionally resort to out-of-frame scare tactics, most of                Candyman's dread comes from the grungy, graffiti filled walls                of Cabrini Green and Glass' accompaniment, a mix of synthesized                music and operatic vocals. 
 
 But for all the dark, sinister atmospherics, Candyman falls                short of its aspirations. Starting with the cliché of the                innocent victim blamed for the murders of an unseen madman and ending                with an extremely ill-advised reincarnation twist, the script beings                to stray from the probing inquiries that initially serve as the                film's backbone.
 
 However, the letdowns in narrative merely reduce Candyman from genre classic to slasher classic, with the film's biggest drawback                being that it probably helped inspire both Urban Legends films.
















I suppose that a lot of what
I suppose that a lot of what the author has to say is true about this movie, but I liked it.
However, I would use spell check and re-read over my work before publishing it online... People might just take this review more seriously.