Our editor-in-chief Nate Yapp is proud to have contributed to the new book Hidden Horror: A Celebration of 101 Underrated and Overlooked Fright Flicks, edited by Aaron Christensen. Another contributors include Anthony Timpone, B.J. Colangelo, Dave Alexander, Classic-Horror.com's own Robert C. Ring and John W. Bowen. Pick up a copy today from Amazon.com!

Guinea Pig: Flower of Flesh and Blood (1985)

Review

Author
Date
03-27-2001
Comments
Guinea Pig: Flower of Flesh and Blood
Runtime
42 minutes
Countries
Cast and Crew
Director
Writer
Makeup

When in a video store, horror movie buffs can make selections based on a wide range of factors such as direction, cinematography, acting, and style. And on some days, some may just want to see the blood fly. Flower of Flesh and Blood is noteworthy in that it strips the traditional splatter formula down to the bare minimum. It does not burden itself with things like plot or characters. It is simply a filmed record of an extremely graphic murder, and the intensity that results in watching it can be compared to drinking a triple shot of Everclear. It burns going down, gives you the shakes when it hits, and leaves you feeling dazed and nauseous.

In a nutshell, a young Japanese woman is abducted by an unidentified assailant. She wakes in a blood-splattered room, tied to a bed, and the assailant presents himself to her dressed as a Samurai warrior. He injects her with a powerful narcotic, ensures that she is unconscious and unreceptive to pain, then proceeds to slowly and methodically dismember her with a variety of tools. As the title indicates, this man finds beauty in death, and his demeanor during the mutilation is that of an artist carving figures from stone.

Flower of Flesh and Blood is part of the Japanese Guinea Pig series, and it is likely the most notorious film of the bunch. Controversy was fueled by an FBI investigation concerning the possibility that the work was a genuine snuff film. This was proved to be false, and was further reinforced by a "making of" film release by the producers which detailed the special effects techniques. (At the risk of sounding like a wiseass, I really can't understand why anyone seriously thought that this film depicted a genuine murder. I have never seen a real snuff film, nor do I wish to. However, I would imagine that the ones which do exist don't employ techniques such as multiple camera angles, slow motion, or musical soundtracks. And I'm quite certain that, unlike in this movie, a person would be dead long before both of their arms and legs were completely severed.)

I found Flower of Flesh and Blood to be disturbing and sadistic. Yet I would recommend this film, mainly because it doesn't pretend to be anything other than what it is. If you are looking for gore, it will deliver. With interest. I should add, however, that there is no campy quality that some other splatter films employ to soften the psychological impact of the violence. And being a fan of special makeup effects for over twenty years, I can say that the quality of these are exceptionally good. This is not a "fun" movie to watch, and its images may linger in your mind for a longer period of time than you'd prefer.

Comments

Gee, I'm glad you watched

Gee, I'm glad you watched this one for me. Thanks for the warning and all that. Nicely done review, however. So how long did those images linger?

Post new comment

All comments should adhere to Classic-Horror.com's Comment Policy
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <sup> <blockquote> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <br> <p>
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Search